Bai vs Commissioner
Judges:
12 March, 2012·RULE returnable on 16.4.2012. Ad-interim relief shall continue as interim relief till final disposal of this petition. Mr. Rakesh R. Patel, learned AGP waives service of Rule for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Ms. Sejal V. Sutaria, learned advocate waives service of Rule for respondent No.3.[R.M.CHHAYA,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mansa vs Union
Judges:
12 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA) By way of this writ-petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ- petitioner has prayed for declaration that the provisions contained in Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aniruddhsinh vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Rule.Mr. Maulik Nanavati, learned A.P.P., waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no. 1.This is an application for releasing the applicant convict on temporary bail on the ground of repairs of his house.Considering the averments made in this ap...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Gyanchand
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. This application has been filed by the applicant (original petitioner) to condone the delay of 364 days and set aside abatement, while permitting them to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased - respondent No.2 - Shri Shankarbhai Chhaganbhai, who passed away on 26.03....
High Court Of Gujarat
L.H vs Lavjibhai
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellants have challenged the judgement and award dated 17.02.2011, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gondal Camp at Jetpur, in M.A.C.P. No.68 of 2001, whereby the tribunal has dismissed the claim petition filed by the present appellants.2. The brief facts ...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Rule. Mr. Raval, Ld.APP waives service of rule for the respondent - State.2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of both the sides, the matter is taken up for final disposal today.3. Heard Mr. ND Nanavati, Ld. Sr. Counsel with Mr. Hriday Buch, Ld. Advocate for the petitio...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sajjad vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners herein - original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being C.R.No.I-61 of 2010 registered with Palsana Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 366 of the Indian ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pratap vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·By way of present application, filed through jail, the applicant has prayed to release him on temporary bail for a period of 30 days on the ground of sickness of his father.Heard Mr.H.L. Jani, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1-State and also perused papers produced before ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Labh vs Unknown
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. The applicant Labh Marketing Private Limited is the Transferor Company in the Scheme of Amalgamation between Labh Marketing Private Limited and Camex Reality Private Limited. The applicant has filed the present application seeking dispensation of the meeting of Equity Shareholders on the ground t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gajanand vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Chaudhary for the applicant. It appears from the paper book submitted by the applicant that part of the evidence is recorded by one magistrate and the judgement is delivered by his successor. Hence the matter requires consideration and leave to appeal is granted. This appl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.