Jayshreeben vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·The present application is filed seeking to release the applicant on anticipatory bail as she is apprehending her arrest in connection with the complaint being C.R.No.I-207 of 2010 registered with Kamrej Police Station for the alleged offences punishable under Secs.193, 195, 196, 388, 389, 465, 468,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tarlaben vs None For
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. The appellant has invoked Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to call into question decision dated 16.3.2012 of learned Single Judge of this Court in Special Civil Application No.6087 of 2002, whereby the order regarding fixing of seniority of the appellant fr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amreli vs Saurastra
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Having perused the order dated 16.04.2012 of this Court, it transpires that Rule has been issued in the petition and there is a direction that it be heard with Special Civil Application No.18176/2011. Notice as to confirmation of interim relief has been made returnable on 30.06.2012.The Registry to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narmada vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) It is stated by Mr. A.M. Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that he has instructions not to press this matter as his client intends to make representation before the respondents.In view of such stance taken...
High Court Of Gujarat
Late vs National
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Having perused the materials produced on record, it transpires that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous and hence, the draft amendment need not be granted. The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. It will be open to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedin...
High Court Of Gujarat
M vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Notice to the Respondents returnable on 17th July, 2012.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. H.L. Jani waives service of the notice for Respondent No. 1- State.Ad-Interim relief in terms of Para 8(B) till then.(RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J).FH.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gokul vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Draft amendment is permitted. On hearing learned Advocate Shri Satyam Y. Chhaya, appearing for the petitioner as also on examination of order passed by this Court (Coram: Smt. Justice Abhilasha Kumari J.) in Special Civil Application no. 282 of 2012 on 07/02/2012, as identical question of law arises...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghelabhai vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The petitioner and corpus - Lilaben with twin daughters Charmi and Chandani are before us. The petitioner is represented by learned advocate Mr. Buch. State is represented by learned APP Mr. Kodekar. Respondent Nos.2 and 3, though served, have chosen not to app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Marediya vs Uttar
Judges:
13 June, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Keyur A. Vyas, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Sejal Mandavia, learned advocate for respondents No.3, 4 and 5. Mr. Hasurkar, learned advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 has filed leave note.2. Petitioner has taken out present petition, seeking below mentioned reliefs:"(A) YO...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dharmesh vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·The instant application is filed seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with DCB Police Station, Surat, CR No. I - 47/2003 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120-B, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with section 114 of the Indian Pena...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.