Pravinsinh vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. The present application is filed by the convict through his wife seeking temporary bail for a period of 45 days so as to arrange for the admission of his daughter, who has passed 5th standard with 77.33%.2. Rule.Mr. Pujari learned APP waives service of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendrabhai vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. Rule was issued on 12.06.2012 returnable to 15.06.2012.2. RULE.Mr. H. K. Patel, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.3. The learned APP makes available for perusal of fax message received from the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajak vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·1. Rule.Mr. K.L.Pandya, learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.2. Having considered the submissions advanced by the applicant in person, so also considering the fact that he was released on Temporary bail for ten days by this court vide order dated 5.6.2012 passed in Cr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aahir vs 4] I
Judges:
15 June, 2012·[1] The present appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the Judgment and order of acquittal dated 18.06.1996 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Junagadh, in Sessions Case No.136 of 1992, whereby the learned Judge has acquitted the responde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paulbhai vs Pragjibhai
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Mr.B.G.Patel, learned advocate appearing for Mr.Nitin N. Pandya, learned advocate for respondent No.1, submits that Mr.Pandya is not in active practice. In addition to that the record shows that respondent Nos.2 to 4 are not served.Fresh notice of rule to the respondents returnable on 06.07.2012. Di...
High Court Of Gujarat
Goswami vs Chavda
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Heard learned advocate, Mr.M.J.Parikh for the appellant and learned advocate, Mr.H.M.Parikh for the respondents.With the consent of both the learned advocates appearing for both the parties, it is ordered that as far as the issue of Lis pendens is concerned, the civil court will decide the same whil...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mr Nagesh Sood
Judges:
15 June, 2012·In view of the elevation of Mr. Anant S. Dave, the then learned Advocate, to the Bench of this High Court, as usual, NOTICE is directed to be issued to the petitioner for making suitable arrangment for the legal representation or remaining present as party on the next date.S.O. to 28th January, 2005...
High Court Of Gujarat
A vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Issue Notice to respondents, returnable on 13th July, 2012.In the meantime respondents shall file their Reply, as to why the representation of the petitioner dated 1st July, 2010 is not considered by the respondents till date, in view of order dated 18th June, 2010, passed by this Court at Annexure-...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appeal From Order No. 295 Of 1986 vs Mr Shantilal S Shah For
Judges:
15 June, 2012·1.The appellant has by way of this Appeal from Order challenged the order dated 3rd May, 1986 below Exh. 6 passed by the Civil Judge (S.D.) Jamnagar in Civil Suit No. 109/98, whereby the Trial Court has passed the following order :-"The present ad-interim injunction application is allowed. The order...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.