Kalubhai Dhulaji Baranda Opponents
Judges: Z K Saiyed
16 June, 2012·1. The present appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 6.1.1996 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Amreli, in Sessions Case No.520 of 1994, whereby the accused has been acquitted from the charges leveled agai...
High Court Of Gujarat
Husainkha Peerkha Pathan Opponents
Judges: Z K Saiyed, Z K
16 June, 2012·1. The present appeal, under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30.9.1995 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad City, in Sessions Case No.196 of 1994, whereby the accused has been acquitted from the c...
High Court Of Gujarat
Thakarda Hariji Ravaji Opponents
Judges: Z K Saiyed, Z K
16 June, 2012·1. Though served, but nobody is appeared on behalf of the respondent. Therefore, the Appeal is taken up for final hearing on today.2. The present appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 10.12.1993 passe...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat
Judges: Z K Saiyed
16 June, 2012·[1] The present appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the Judgment and order of acquittal dated 29.09.1994 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mehsana, in Sessions Case No.78 of 1994, whereby the learned Judge has acquitted the respondent – accused ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pohoomal Kewalram Sons - Through ... vs Maruti Utemet Pvt Ltd & 2
Judges:
16 June, 2012·The Registry has put up submission dated 14.06.2012 stating that while generating regular number of Company Petition No.710 of 2012 filed by learned advocate Mr. D.M. Ahuja, a mistake has been committed and the same has been converted into Company Application No.192 of 2012.It is stated that due to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mitul vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Rule.MR.K.L.Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.The instant application is filed seeking temporary bail for the period of 30 days in connection with FIR being I- C.R. No.570/2008 registered with Kapodra Police Station, District:Surat regarding...
High Court Of Gujarat
Janta vs Gujarat
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned advocate Ms Mansi Vyas for Shri N.K.Majmudar stated that Shri Majmudar does not appear for the respondent. In any case, Gujarat Electricity Board respondent herein has been subdivided into different Zonal electricity companies.Counsel for the appell...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Navuben
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Notice qua respondent No.3 is not received back. Await the service upto 27.2.2012.(K.S. JHAVERI ,J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pohoomal vs Maruti
Judges:
16 June, 2012·The Registry has put up submission dated 14.06.2012 stating that while generating regular number of Company Petition No.710 of 2012 filed by learned advocate Mr. D.M. Ahuja, a mistake has been committed and the same has been converted into Company Application No.192 of 2012.It is stated that due to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.