Nilesh vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Mr. Nanavati, Ld. APP for the respondent - State, upon instructions, states that in the instant matter, charge-sheet is filed. Mr. BM Mangukia, Ld. Advocate for the applicants, in turn, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this application, reserving liberty of the applicants to move the appropri...
High Court Of Gujarat
H vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 6(B), subject to all rights and contentions available to the respondents. Rule is made absolute.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harsoliya vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Mansuri for the applicant. Having regard to the facts of the case, leave to appeal is granted. This application stands disposed of.(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J) (pkn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jamsherkhan vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Heard learned advocate, Mr.N.K.Majmudar for the applicants and learned APP, Ms.Calla for the State.The present application is filed seeking to release the applicants on anticipatory bail as they are apprehending arrest in connection with the complaint being C.R.No.I-118 of 2011 registered with Gadh ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagubhai vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·The petitioner-original complainant in CR I. No. 48 of 2011 registered with Narmada Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 342, 395, 427, 435 and 506(2) of IPC and one of the witness in Sessions Case No. 2 of 2012 has approached this court under Articles 226 an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shamjibhai vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-"[a] Your Lordships be pleased to admit this petition.[b] Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction holding that the inaction on the part of the respondents...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kantiji vs The
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The present application has been preferred by the applicant - accused for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend the engagement of his son.Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Court, the learned APP, based on the report received by him...
High Court Of Gujarat
Official vs Unknown
Judges:
16 June, 2012·1. The Official Liquidator has filed this Report seeking the following directions :1.1 By order dated 13.02.2002 passed in Company Petition No.47/1992 with Company Petition No.291/1997 with Company Petition No.348/1999, the Company, that is, Gujarat Hi-Tech Industries Limited has been ordered to be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Natubhai
Judges:
16 June, 2012·It appears that despite service of notice of rule, the respondent has not appeared. In view of the fact that the matter has come up after long time after issuance of rule, issue fresh notice to the respondent returnable on 18.7.2012.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J.) shekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pthan vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP.Considering the nature of allegations and the submissions made by the learned advocate for the applicant, a case is made out at this stage to grant ad-interim relief in terms of paragraph 7(B).S.O.To 7.3.2012.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.