Meru vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Present applications are preferred by the applicant-convict for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend the marriage of his cousin sister's who has no brother in the family.Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Court,learned APP, based o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganpatsinh vs Hansaben
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Mr. Nayan Parekh, Ld.Advocate for the applicant submits that despite the fact that his client - the applicant herein came to be served by a communication dated 6/8/2011 requesting him to extend cooperation in this matter and to provide instructions, yet he has not received any instructions from the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harvindersingh vs Authorised
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Since this Court in the case of Mansa Synthetic Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, reported in AIR 2012 GUJ 90, has already upheld the validity of the provisions contained in Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financia...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogesh vs Bharvad
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Now, the matter is ready. To be listed for final hearing on 28.2.2012.(K.S. JHAVERI ,J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paramjit vs Kotak
Judges:
16 June, 2012·As the cause title of the petition declares and even the subject matter of the petition as contained in the memo of petition and as the relief prayed for by the petitioner also disclose, the petition is not related and/or it does not arise from the Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dilavarbhai vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Notice to the Respondents returnable on 6th July, 2012.Learned APP Ms. Archana Rawal waives service of Notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are permitted to be served by RPAD over and above the normal mode of service.Ad interim relief in terms of paragraph 10(D) is grant...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Mr Rakesh
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) None present for the respondent except learned AGP. Respondent nos.4 and 5 are stated to have been served by the applicant. Delay of 19 days in preferring the appeal is condoned and Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.(D.H.Waghela, J.) (G.B.Shah,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of Indias vs State Of Gujarat Through Dy Collector And Acqus &Opponents Common
Judges: M R Shah
16 June, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 220 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 252 of 2010WithCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 273 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 294 of 2010WithCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 295 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 324 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of Indias vs State Of Gujarat Through Dy Collector And Acqus &Opponents Common
Judges: M R Shah
16 June, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 220 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 252 of 2010WithCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 273 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 294 of 2010WithCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 295 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 324 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of Indias vs State Of Gujarat Through Dy Collector And Acqus &Opponents Common
Judges: M R Shah
16 June, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 220 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 252 of 2010WithCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 273 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 294 of 2010WithCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 295 of 2010ToCIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 324 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.