Mohmad vs Ashma
Judges:
16 June, 2012·It appears that pursuant to the order dated 8.2.2012, notice was issued to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 by RPAD. However, it appears that acknowledgment due has not returned. Hence, Registry is directed to make inquiry about the same.S.O.to 3.7.2012.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J.) shekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73371b12011e16001b111b121a33">[email protected]</a> vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Mr.Maharshi Patel, learned advocate for HL Patel Advocates, learned advocate for the applicant, upon instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application, at this stage. Permission as prayed for is granted. The instant application stands disposed of as withdrawn, at this stage.(J.C.UPADHYAYA,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Punjiben vs Babuji
Judges:
16 June, 2012·R & P to be called for from the trial court concerned so as to reach this Court on or before 9.3.2012. To be listed in final hearing Board.(K.S. JHAVERI ,J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Laghubhai vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule.Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule.The present application has been preferred by the applicant - convict for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend the marriage of his brother's daughter and son.It appears from the ja...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amit vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Rule. Mr. H.L.Jani, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent - State.This is an application preferred by convict prisoner of Session Case No.244 of 2009 for temporary bail on the ground of marriage of his brother. In support of his contention he has produced Invitation Card.Heard M...
High Court Of Gujarat
Supershine vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue notice, returnable on July 16, 2012. Since learned advocate Mr.Meena appears on behalf of respondent No.2, we dispense with service of notice upon respondent No.2.We also dispense with service of notice upon the respondent No....
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Shanker
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Notice to respondent No.1 is unserved. Learned APP Miss Shah states that she has received a report from the Investigating Officer that respondent No.1 is lodged in Central Jail, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad. Therefore, notice be served to respondent No.1 at Central Jail, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad.In view of abov...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anil vs General
Judges:
16 June, 2012·By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who was working as a peon and daily wager, according to the averments made in the petition, with the respondent-Bank at list till 13.09.2009, has filed this petition for the following reliefs:"a. Your Lordships m...
High Court Of Gujarat
Icchaben vs None For
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.M. B. Parikh for learned advocate Mr.M. C. Shah requests for time to enable him to get instruction stating that he is appearing, but he would get necessary instruction and file his appearance. S.O to 28th February 2012. To be notified along with First Appeal Nos.1516 and 1517 of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.