Balvantsinh vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to arrange for amount of fine.Learned APP Mr.Pujari has invited attention of the Court to the jail remarks; wherein, it is mentioned that in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanubhai vs Bariya
Judges:
16 June, 2012·BELOW OFFICE NOTE This Court vide order dated 26.12.2011, directed the Trial Court to rehear both the parties and decide the application Exh.5 for temporary injunction.Considering the fact that the reply is yet to be filed in the said injunction application filed by the defendant No.2, time granted ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amletha vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Mr.T.V.Shah, learned advocate states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.3 and prays for time in order to file the Vakalatnama and affidavit-in-reply.The endorsement on the Board indicates that the notices issued to respondents Nos.5 and 6 have not been received ba...
High Court Of Gujarat
Husenkhan vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) In view of the fact that the appeal is fixed for final hearing today and is likely to be heard, this application is disposed of.( A.L. DAVE, J. ) ( A.J. DESAI, J. ) syed/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage.Permission granted as prayed for. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Istiyak vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives notice of Rule.The present application is for enlargement of the applicant-convict on temporary bail on the ground of sickness of family members.From the jail report, it appears that from May 2011 onwards, by this time,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dudabhai vs State
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Mr.M.B.Parikh, learned advocate, states upon instructions, that he may be permitted to delete petitioner No.1 - Dudabhai Chhganbhai Patliya, as petitioner. Permission to do so is granted. The necessary amendment be made forthwith.Heard Mr.M.B.Parikh, learned advocate for the petitioners.Issue Notice...
High Court Of Gujarat
Laxmanbhai vs Director
Judges:
16 June, 2012·1. Heard Mr.M.K. Patel, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr.H.H. Pandit, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.Niraj Ashar, learned A.G.P. for respondent No.3. Though served, no one appears for respondent No.1.2. By way of this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prerak vs Jethalal
Judges:
16 June, 2012·The challenge is made in this petition to the order passed in Execution Petition No.152 of 2011 by the learned Chamber Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad on 23rd February, 2012.Learned advocate Shri Tattvam K. Patel appearing for the judgment-debtor, petitioner herein, submitted that there is no app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagdishbhai vs Competent
Judges:
16 June, 2012·Draft amendment is permitted to be carried out.Heard Mr. AB Joshi, Ld. Advocate for the applicant.NOTICE of the main relief as well as of the interim relief returnable on 03/07/2012. DS qua respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 is permitted. Respondent no. 1 to be served by R.P.A.D over and above regular servi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.