Commissioner vs In
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. In these appeals, the revenue has called in question a common judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 17-8-2009. The respondent assessee is common in all the appeals. The issue involved is identical, however, pertaining to different assessment...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Learned
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned counsel for the appellant-assessee and the respondent-Revenue jointly submitted that out of the very same judgment impugned in these appeals, Revenue has filed Tax Appeal No.966 of 2010. It would, therefore, be desirable to hear the assessee's appea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kunverben vs Karsan
Judges:
03 July, 2012·1. The appellants, original claimants, have filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for enhancement, against the judgment and award dated 27th April, 2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Aux-2], Kutch-Bhuj in M.A.C. Petition No.621 of 1991, whereby, the Tri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Royal vs Unknown
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Considering the averments made in paragraphs 1 to 6, prayers in terms of paragraph 7(b)(c)(d) are granted with a condition that the applicant is directed to remove office objection within a week from today.This application is disposed of.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharat vs Raghubha
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Learned advocate pointed out that non judicial stamp papers of Rs.50,600/- were purchased on 13th March, 2012 for the purpose of registration of sale deed. This affixing of stamp duty is indicative of the market price price of the property and the same could never be less than Rs.2 Lacs. Considering...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs 3.2002
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Ms. Sejal Mandavia, learned standing counsel for Central Excise and Customs Department.2. Admit.3.0 We formulate the following substantial question of law."Whether or not in view of provisions of Rule 6(2), Rule 6(3)(b) and sub rule 5 of Rule...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hafizmehbubbhai vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·The matter was listed yesterday and Mr.Maulik Nanavati, learned APP, was asked to take instructions in the matter, more particularly in regards to the certificate (at Page 16 to the application). Learned APP requests to adjourn the matter tomorrow. Hence, temporary bail granted by this Court (Coram:...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhya vs Ambalal
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Heard Mr. Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner, and Ms. Nehal Rathod, learned advocate, for Ms. Gangwar, learned advocate for the respondent.Under order dated 27.12.2011, the Court directed office to issue notice, making it returnable on 27.1.2012. Since then, the petition is pending on Admissi...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Ms Jirga Jhaveri App For
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Heard.Leave to appeal is granted. The application stands disposed of.[ Z. K. SAIYED, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Faridaben
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. The appellant-State has invoked clause-15 of the Letters Patent for calling into question order dated 22.7.2011 in SCA 9143 of 2011 of learned single Judge, whereby the appellant is directed to consider the representation dated 27.7.2010 of the original pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.