Sitaben vs Deputy
Judges:
03 July, 2012·[1] This Civil Application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay of 729 days occurred in filing Civil Application for bringing heirs on record of First Appeal No.4632 of 2008.[2] Taking into consideration averments made in the application and same has not been controverted ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhojubha vs Ravaji
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Dispute is between son, father and family members.Notice returnable on 27th July, 2012.Direct Service is permitted.[M.D.SHAH,J.] Hasan.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Radheshyam vs Gujarat
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) The learned counsel for the parties agree that the interim order granted earlier on February 14, 2012, which has since expired on June 01, 2012, be restored and be further continued for a period of two months from today. We, accordi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yusufbhai vs Gujarat
Judges:
03 July, 2012·It is submitted by Shri Viren Dave, learned Advocate for the appellant that he has instruction to appear on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant.At his request the matter stands adjourned to 16th July, 2012.[M.D.SHAH,J.] Hasan.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahida vs Rekhaben
Judges:
03 July, 2012·It is submitted by Shri Sheetal Patel, learned Advocate that he has instructed to apear on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants and he is permitted to file his Vakalatnama.At his request the matter stands adjourned to 20th July, 2012.[MD SHAH, J.] Hasan.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Imtiyaz vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Office objections to be removed on or before 19.07.2012, finally, failing which, the matter shall be notified for further orders. The Registry is directed to keep copy of this order in each matter.(RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J.) mehul Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Malsatar vs Special
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Fresh notice to respondent No.4 only, returnable on 17.07.2012.The Registry is directed to show the name of Government Pleader for respondent Nos.2 and 3.Status-quo granted earlier to continue till then. Direct service is permitted.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Heard learned A.P.P. Mr. N.J. Shah for the appellant. Admit. As learned advocate Mr. Chirag Patel appears for respondents, warrant is not required to be issued to the respondents.(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J) (pkn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Regional vs Adam
Judges:
03 July, 2012·If process fee is not paid on or before 6-7-2012, returnable date is extended till 26-7-2012. If process fee is not paid within that period, it will be treated as dismissed.[M.D.SHAH,J.] radhan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Food vs Shramik
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)1). Draft amendment is granted.2) The present application is filed by the applicants, seeking directions against the opponent No.1 to redeposit an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- with interest as per the amended clause.3) We have heard Mr. Vakil, learned counsel ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.