Ramratanbhai vs Kankuben
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule returnable on 24.7.2012.(Jayant Patel, J.) (C. L. Soni, J.) vinod Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirabhai vs Municipal
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Notice returnable on 24.07.2012.Direct service is permitted.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mustak vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Rule.Learned AGP Mr. Rindani waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.3. The registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention. Direct service qua respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is permitted.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vidyadhan vs National
Judges:
03 July, 2012·To be listed on 09.07.2012. In the meantime, learned counsel Mr. YC Contractor appearing on behalf of respondent no.2-University states that the respondent no.2-University will not take steps in pursuance of its letter in question.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Central ... vs Learned Counsel For The Appellant ...
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned Counsel for the appellant Mr. Y. N. Ravani to supply fresh address of respondent. List the matter after two weeks i.e. on 17.07.2012.(V. M. SAHAI, J.) (N. V. ANJARIA, J.) Sunil W. Wagh...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Faridaben
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. This application for condoning delay of 555 days in preferring the appeal is objected by the respondent, who relied upon the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex court in recent decision in the case of Office of Chief Postmaster General v/s Living Media I...
High Court Of Gujarat
Employees vs Reserve
Judges:
03 July, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow the present petition with cost.(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, holding and declaring that in view of special provision...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayman vs The
Judges:
03 July, 2012·This matter was heard at length. At this stage, learned advocate for the respondent-employer indicated that though in LPA No. 999 of 1997 in SCA No. 4533 of 1977, the order of granting permission to withdraw the matter being SCA No. 4533 of 1997 on 21/8/1997 was passed and it was treated to have bee...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vasant vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 24.01.2012 passed by respondent no.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short "the Act") by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Secti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paschim vs Zala
Judges:
03 July, 2012·This is an application for condonation of delay of 14 days caused in filing the First Appeal. In view of the fact that the reasons stated in this application have not been controverted by the otherside by filing an affidavit and also in view of the principles governing the discretionary exercise of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.