State vs Appearance
Judges:
04 July, 2012·The present acquittal Appeal has been filed by the appellant - original complainant, State of Gujarat under Section 378 Cr. P.C., against the Judgment and order dated 30.12.1996 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.19, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No.15 of 1993. The said case w...
High Court Of Gujarat
Praful vs Central
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Rule.Learned advocate Mr. Y.N.Ravani waives for Opponent no. 1 and learned APP Ms. Shah waives for Opponent no. 2.With consent of learned advocate for the parties and learned APP for the Opponent State, this application is taken up for final hearing.By filing this application under section 389 of th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babu vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·By filing this application, the applicants-convicts have made a prayer to direct the respondents to undertake their DNA test and to submit report in that regard on the ground that with a view to unearth the real culprits , application Exhs. 64 and 65 for DNA test was given by the prosecution but as ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
04 July, 2012·The present Appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is filed by the appellant - State of Gujarat against the Judgment and order dated 31.7.1995 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himatnagar, in Atrocity Case No. 24 of 1994, whereby the learned Judge has acquitted t...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
04 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) S.O.to 1st August 2012, at the request of Mr.Sheth, who proposes to place on record evidence of the application of the petitioner under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act which is claimed to have been filed and received in the office of the Special Lan...
High Court Of Gujarat
Damodardas Boghabhai Prajapatis vs Pravinbhai Khodabhai Solanki &Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
03 July, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the applicant- original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned appellate Bench of the Small Cause Court at Ahmedabad dated 20/03/2003 in Civil Ap...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramdeviben Mahadevmal Sindhi Alias Thakkar Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
03 July, 2012·[1.0] Present Civil Revision Application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the petitioner herein – original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 30.09.1997 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Kheralu in Regular Civil Suit No...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 2 -
Judges: Anant S Dave, Anant S
03 July, 2012·1) This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 20.01.2012 passed by respondent No.2 in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenue as a “bootlegger” as defined un...
High Court Of Gujarat
Alamsai Rajabsai Sai Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
03 July, 2012·[1.0] Present Civil Revision Application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the petitioners herein – original defendants to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Appellate Court – learned 2nd Joint District Judge...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 2 -
Judges: Anant S
03 July, 2012·1) This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 20.01.2012 passed by respondent No.2 in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenue as a “bootlegger” as defined un...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.