Mabudbhai vs District
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Nirad D. Buch, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. H.S.Munshaw, learned Counsel for the respondent-Panchayat. Though served no one appears for respondent No.1.2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have interalia challenged the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Somabhai vs Harijan
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1. Challenge in this petition is to the order of the trial court being Regular Civil Suit No. 154 of 2000 whereby the request of impleading the heirs of the deceased plaintiff has been rejected.2. The petitioner No. 6 and late Nathubhai Punjabhai Badwa filed suit being Regular Civil Suit No. 154 of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1. The civil application and the petition were heard to some extent on 3.7.2012. So as to enable the respondent-Gujarat Maritime Board and the respondent-State to place necessary and relevant factual aspects on record, the hearing was deferred to today. One of the main reasons which necessitated cer...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lh vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR)1. This Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge passed in Special Civil Application No.7154 of 2011 by which, learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners.2. The issue before the learned Singl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vinuba vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)1. The corpus is before us. The police agency has got her examined and the medical certificate issued by Dr. H.K. Rathod, Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, states that on the basis of appearance and fusion of epiphyses radiological bone, age appears to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Minesh vs District
Judges:
04 July, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 04.02.2012 passed by respondent no.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short "the Act") by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Secti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aalamkhan vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Heard Mr. Bhoharia, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE. Mr.Rashesh Rindani, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriatim a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raghubha vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Mr.Tirmizi, learned Advocate for the applicant does not press this application at this stage. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The instant application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) Ashish N.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
5 vs Rule Served For Respondent(S) : 2
Judges:
04 July, 2012·As the endorsement shows that notice is unserved on respondent No.3, the matter to await service of notice.[N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.