Sherbahadur vs State
Judges:
06 July, 2012·Mr.Kotai, learned advocate for the petitioner, has submitted that since the Mamlatdar has submitted a report which declares that the petitioner is not undertaking activity of preparing food items in open area and is not throwing filth and left-over in open area, the petitioner desires to approach th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narmadaben vs State
Judges:
06 July, 2012·1. Rule.Learned A.P.P., Mr.H.L.Jani waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.1-State of Gujarat and learned advocate Mr.P.R. Abhichandani waives service of notice of Rule for Respondent No.2-Original Complainant.2. The present application has been filed by the applicant-original accused un...
High Court Of Gujarat
Haji vs Unknown
Judges:
06 July, 2012·Present application has been preferred by the applicants herein - original appellants to restore the Second Appeal No.51 of 2012 which came to be dismissed by this Court for non-prosecution.Having heard Shri Mansuri, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants and considering the averment...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nagaji vs Raichandji
Judges:
06 July, 2012·On depositing an amount of Rs 10,000/- within seven days before the Registry of the High Court.Notice shall be issued to the respondents making it returnable on 23rd July 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J.) mary// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narmadaben vs Gujarat
Judges:
06 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) On consent of the parties, the trial run and observation period as indicated in our earlier order be extended for further period of one month on the same terms and conditions as indicated in the said earlier order.Direct service to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Muhammed vs State
Judges:
06 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Present application is preferred by the applicant convict for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend the Sunnat ceremony of his son. It appears that the ceremony is fixed today and even if the application is considered, it will not be possible...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitul vs State
Judges:
06 July, 2012·Shri R.K. Savjani, learned advocate for Shri Champaneri, learned advocate for applicant states that all the advocates for the parties have jointly requested for seeking time and they have submitted that the matter be posted on 27.7.2012. Orders accordingly.Registry is directed to place the copy of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pashchim vs Shivam
Judges:
06 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Learned counsel Ms. Hingorani for Ms. LK Bhaya for the applicant states that the amount of cost has already been paid so far. She is having cheque number. She prays for time to produce the receipt. S.O. to 13th July, 2012.(Jayant Patel,J.) (C.L.Soni,J.) an ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirenbhai Rameshbhai Thakkar & 2 vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
06 July, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.P.P.Majmudar for the petitioners does not press this petition for Petitioner No.1-Husband.Notice to the Respondents, returnable on 27.07.2012.Learned APP Mr.H.L.Jani, waives service of notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.It is clarified that in the meanwhile, no coercive ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulamkhan vs State
Judges:
06 July, 2012·Learned advocate appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application.The permission sought for is granted.The application stands disposed of accordingly as withdrawn. Rule is discharged.(M.D. SHAH, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.