Mansukhlal vs Rajkot
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA) Petitioners have challenged the notice dated 9th February 2005 issued under Section 13(2) of the The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short Securitisation Act ) on the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chotila vs Vinodbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Heard learned advocates for the parties. Order passed on 30.07.2010, staying the operation of the order of the learned Single Judge to the extent that Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act would be invoked only from the date of filing of the petition, is ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Nos.1-2
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The present application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in preferring Second Appeal.Heard Mr.H. K. Patel, learned AGP for the petitioners. The otherside has no objection if the delay is condoned.Having considered the averments and as sufficient cause is made o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Iffco-Tokio vs Bharatbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Order in the Appeal:-Learned advocate Mr. Ajay Mehta submitted that the learned Tribunal has taken into account the future/prospective income in a claim petition preferred under Section-163A in which an account of absence of any evidence regarding income the Tribunal ought to have proceeded on the b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Roshanben vs Mohanbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·This petition is directed against the order dated 16.3.2010 passed below Exhibit 73 by the learned Judge, City Civil Court in Civil Suit No. 3268 of 1996.The petitioners herein are the original defendant Nos. 2 to 4 whereas present respondent No.1 is the plaintiff who has filed said suit for specifi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Veterinary vs Dashrathsinh
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Munshaw, learned advocate for the petitioner.2. What was before the labour Court was the dispute regarding respondent's termination from service which was effected by the petitioner in 2002.2.1 The labour Court was required to decide as to whether the said termination was legally and su...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yusuf vs Rashidbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. On the ground that the defendants are not in lawful occupation of the disputed premises, but are trespassers, the petitioner opposed the supply of electricity connection to the suit premises which are in possession and occupation of the defendants. As per the petitioner's allegation, the defendan...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shekhar vs Commissioner
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. Leave to amend. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents.2. The petitioner-detenue has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 9.11...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Mehta
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 13th December 1993 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.4470/1988 by...
High Court Of Gujarat
Charotar vs Admission
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) The petitioner is an educational institution. It has challenged order dated 6.8.2009 passed by the Fee Regulatory Committee namely Justice R.J. Shah (retired) Committee, fixing the fee structure for the academic year 2008-2009 at Rs. 23,000/- per student pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.