Hazira vs Unknown
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Upon the application of the abovenamed company by summons dated 9.1.2012, filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, upon hearing Mrs. Swati Soparkar, learned advocate for the applicant company and upon reading of the affidavit dated 29.12.2011, filed in support of the Judge's summo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Devjibhai vs Suresh
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1.0 This appeal is directed against the judgement and award dated 15.07.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main.), Kachchh at Bhuj in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 87 of 2002 whereby the claim petition preferred by the claimants came to be allowed by awarding Rs. 2, 44, 500/- to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arunaben vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned counsel for the parties.This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 26.11.2009 passed by the respondent No.2 in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short "the Act") by detaining the lady-d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs Ramagauri
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 15.04.1996 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Main], Bhavnagar in M.A.C.P. No. 330 OF 1991, whereby the claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimants were awarded total compensation of Rs.1,82,144/- alon...
High Court Of Gujarat
Divisional vs Pratapbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Ms. Sejal K. Mandavia on behalf of petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Priyank P. Jhaveri on behalf of respondent. This Court has passed following order on 26.03.2010.Heard learned advocate Ms. Sejal K. Mandavia appearing on behalf of Petitioner.Considering her submissions, que...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhavanbhai vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.2. Following aspects are considered :-(i) The applicants are facing charges for the offence punishable under Sections 306 and 114 of IPC;(ii) There has been dispute between the deceased and the applicant...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramanlal vs Additional
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred, with the following prayers:"(a) Your Lordships be pleased to admit and allow this petition;(b) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the natu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhurubhai vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P for the State.2. After the order of Sessions Court dated 20.4.2010, Charge sheet has been filed on 30.4.2010 and, therefore, this application is treated as post-charge sheet application.3. Following aspects are considered :-(i) Alleg...
High Court Of Gujarat
Navinkumar vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The applicant has filed this application for regular bail, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with the offence being CR No. I - 198 of 2011 registered with Sardar Nagar Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offence u/ss. 406, 420, 467, 465, 471, 120-B of I.P. Code.Heard ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sampatiben vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. The petitioner is the widow of an employee, who died on 9.11.2005. The husband of the petitioner was drawing corresponding pay on the basis of Rs.950/- which was granted to him by office order No.1024/93, which was passed in the year 1993 on his completion of 10 years' service as a semi-skilled d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.