Income vs Unknown
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Revenue is in appeal against judgement of the Tribunal dated 8.1.2010 raising following question for our consideration :"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in reversing the decision of the CIT(A) confirm...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mr Mtm Hakim For vs Coram
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) By instant Application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has prayed to to treat this petition as information to take suo motu action under Article 215 of the Constitution of India against the Respondent for making baseless, conte...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jethiben vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 28.09.1998 passed by the Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, Ahmedabad, in Revision Application No. 69 of 1997, whereby the said revision application was dismissed.2. The short facts of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Husenabanu vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. Leave to amend. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents.2. The petitioner-detenue has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 10.1...
High Court Of Gujarat
A vs Indian
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs;(a) Be pleased to admit this petition.(b) Be pleased to quash and set aside the action of the respondent-Corporation in not removing the anomaly in the basic pay of the peti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Umedbhai vs District
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 06.08.2009, by which the petitioner was dismissed from service and further to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service and pay him regular salary and pay arrears thereto as also ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashwin vs Maheshbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr.P.S.Gogia on behalf of petitioner and learned advocate Mr.R.P.Mankad on behalf of respondent. I have considered submissions made by both the learned advocates. After considering submissions, question involved and raised in present petition requires detail examination. Hence...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mr Hn Jani App For
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) 1 By means of filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to issue appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus and direct the respondent No.5-Police Inspector, Odhav Police Station, Odhav, Ahm...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Ramji
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1.0 Learned Advocate for the appellant is permitted to delete respondent No. 6 from the cause title of the First Appeal.2.0 This appeal is directed against the judgement and award dated 16.04.2005 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (FTC-4), Kachchh at Bhuj in Motor Accident Claim Petit...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nandlal vs Mangalam
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - workman has prayed for an appropriate writ, order and/or direction, quashing and setting aside the impugned judgement and award dated 03/07/2009 passed by Labour Court, Valsad in Reference (LCV) No.472 of 199...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.