Jayesh vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. Heard, learned Advocate for the applicant and Mr.Parikh, learned A.P.P. for the opponent State.Following aspects are considered.The applicant is charged with offence punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 114 of the IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.The account of incident as ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hiralben vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.310/2011 with Navrangpura Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.Learned Counsel for th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Thro' vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The present application has been filed by the convict under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of temporary bail.The applicant-accused is charged with having committed offences under Sections 306, 386, 506(2), 507 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, for which, FIR being C.R.NO...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramtiyabhai vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.2. Following aspects are considered :-(i) The applicants are facing charges for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 452 of IPC and Section 25(1)(A) of the Arms Act and Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. This petition has been preferred under Article-226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers:-(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent authority to consider the various representations including dated 10.12.2009 submitted...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jatin vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. The present Criminal Misc.Application u/s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicants herein- original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being C.R.No.I-4/2008 registered with DCB Police Station, Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayantibhai vs Commissioner
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. Leave to amend. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents.2. The petitioner-detenue has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 7.11...
High Court Of Gujarat
Firozkhan vs Commissioner
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents.2. The petitioner-detenue has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 24.11.2009 passed by...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Minaxiben
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 16th August 1993 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.4269/1991 by t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajabhai vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P for the State.3. Following aspects are considered :-(i) Charge sheet has been filed on 22.4.2010;(ii) Co.accused Valji Rudabhai Karena has been admitted to bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application No. 3591/2010 by order date...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.