Aaftab vs Appearance
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The applicant alleges non-compliance of order dated 29.03.2007 passed by this Court in Special Civil Application No. 8078/1997, whereby the Court gave following direction :-Under the circumstances, if all the conditions mentioned in order of the Regional Direct...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pannalal vs Punjab
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA) Against the measures taken under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Security Interest Act, 2002, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 o...
High Court Of Gujarat
M/S vs Uttar
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Heard learned Advocate Mr. Damani for petitioner. Learned Advocate Mr.Damani has placed on record draft amendment which has been allowed with a direction to petitioner to carry out same within one week from today.In para 19-b, petitioner is praying for quashing and setting aside demand of Rs.17,36,3...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayavant vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·Counsel for the petitioner submitted that learned Magistrate on a private complaint after initially deciding the whole inquiry under Section 202 of Criminal Procedure Code through Police, later on, an application by the complainant by an order dated 8.7.2009 sent the complaint for investigation unde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vinodbhai vs Vasantbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1.0 The appellants original defendant nos. 4 to 6 in Special Civil Suit No. 308 of 2003 are before this Court being aggrieved by order dated 11th March 2010 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Surat, whereby the learned Judge allowed the injunction application and granted injunction ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirabhai vs Malakhraj
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The applicant has preferred this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 59 days occurred in preferring the First Appeal.Heard learned advocates for the parties. Looking to the averments made in this application, delay of 59 days occurred in preferring the F...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manjulaben vs Rameshbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. This application is made to recall the order dated 05.03.2001, whereby this Court had granted leave to delete opponents No.8 to 12 in the main L.P.A. and, in effect, to restore the names of opponents No.8 to 12 herein as respondents before final hearing of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 30th April 1993 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.26045/1991 by t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Ambica
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 8th October 1991 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.15512/1989 by ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Amrutlal
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 16th August 1993 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.5933/1991 by t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.