State vs Jaikishanbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 24.10.2007 passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, in Revision Application No. TEN.B.S.133/2003, whereby the said revision application was dismissed.2. The short facts of the case are that the lan...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Amrutlal
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) Challenge in this Appeal filed under Section 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 ('BPMC Act', for short) is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 16th August 1993 rendered in Municipal Valuation Appeal No.4270/1991 by t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sukhadiya vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA)1. In all these cases as common question is involved and similar prayer is made, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.Prayer has been made to direct the 3rd respondent-Admission Committee to bifurcate the total availab...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Ratilal
Judges:
09 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.Mr.Sheth, learned Counsel appears and waives service of notice of admission on behalf of the original claimants and he also declares that the claimants are not desirous to file any cross-objection. With the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhupendrakumar vs Hasmukhlal
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The petition is directed against an interlocutory order dated 21.06.2010 passed by the learned trial Court below Exh.331 in Regular Civil Suit No.845 of 2005. By the impugned order the learned trial Court has rejected application Exh.331 whereby the petitioner prayed, inter alia, that appropriate ac...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manglubhai vs State
Judges:
09 January, 2012·By way of present application, the applicant seeks following corrections in the order dated 9.1.2012 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.16964 of 2011.The Crime Registered No.I-58 of 2011 instead of Crime Registered No.I-50 of 2011 (2) In Condition No.5(f) name of village is mentiioned a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Mr
Judges:
09 January, 2012·The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside the communication dated 15th March, 2010 and also praying for the direction to the respondent authority to reconsider the case of the petitioner on merits. The petitioner has ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogeshbhai vs Chief
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 21.05.2010 passed by the Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, in application no. MVV/JMN/GaDhNa/25/2009, whereby the stay application was rejected.2. The short facts of the case are that on Somaji...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Narsinhbhai
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Gondal Camp at Upleta (for short, "the Tribunal") in M.A.C.P. No.260/2006 dated 28.07.2011, whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed and the appellant and respondent no. 2 - origin...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Kanji
Judges:
09 January, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 19.10.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gandhidham - Kutch in M.A.C.P. No.222/2002 filed u/s.163-A of the M.V. Act whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimants were awarded total comp...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.