State vs Hipo
Judges:
12 January, 2012·Rule returnable on 5th March, 2010.Interim relief in terms of Para No.10d.(AKIL KURESHI,J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahmand vs State
Judges:
12 January, 2012·Rule.Mr. J.K.Shah, learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.3 - jail authority. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention. Direct service is permitted qua respondent Nos.1 and 2.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narsibhai vs State
Judges:
12 January, 2012·In view of an order dated 04.11.2009 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12517/2009, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application. Disposed of as not pressed.(AKIL KURESHI,J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajkot vs Maiyabhai
Judges:
12 January, 2012·At the request of Shri K.M.Paul, learned advocate for the respondent, the matters are adjourned to 11th February, 2010 as there is likelihood of settlement.(S.R. Brahmbhatt, J. ) sudhir Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sughabhai vs State
Judges:
12 January, 2012·Heard Mr. N.D.Nanavaty, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner.Issue notice returnable on 30th January, 2012.Ms.C.M.Shah, learned APP waives service of notice for respondent - State of Gujarat.[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mungadabhai vs State
Judges:
12 January, 2012·Rule.Mr. U.A.Trivedi, learned APP waives service on behalf of opponent State.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is taken up for hearing today.This is an application under Sec.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the applicant who came to be arrested ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vijaysinh vs State
Judges:
12 January, 2012·1. This is an application preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicant who came to be arrested in connection with FIR registered as CR No. I 93 of 2009 with Himatnagar Rural Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 498(1), 306 and 114 of the Indian P...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Arunlal
Judges:
12 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the appellant. Prima facie it appears that the Tribunal has committed an error in granting two different amounts of Rs. 75000/- and Rs. 45000/- as compensation under the head of pain, shock and suffering for amputation of a leg and injury of another leg respectively. The a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramdas vs Lalji
Judges:
12 January, 2012·1. By way of the present petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India through learned advocate Mr.A.R.Majmudar on 4.2.2012, the petitioners have challenged the order of the trial Court dated 12.1.2012 rejecting the application preferred vide Exh.144 for bringing the heirs of the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.