Krishnakumar vs State
Judges:
13 January, 2012·Notice returnable on 07.02.2012.The respondent-authority is directed to file an affidavit explaining as to whether the petitioner's case and the case considered by it by Resolution dated 17.01.2008 at Annexure-I as well as Resolution dated 03.07.1998 at Annexure-J to the petition, is different.Direc...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bakorbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
13 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Office to place the present matter with Criminal Appeal No.1442 of 2011 on 20th January, 2012, since it has been stated by the learned APP that State has already preferred the appeal against the order of acquittal.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirabhai vs Dakshin
Judges:
13 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Rule returnable on 13.2.2012.(A.L.Dave,J.) (C.L.Soni,J.) an vyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vipulbhai vs Niluben
Judges:
13 January, 2012·Learned counsel Mr.Nehal Joshi stated to be unwell. However, learned counsel Mr.Ravindra Shah has requested to delete his name. His name is ordered to be deleted. Adjourned to 20.03.2012.[MOHINDER PAL, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Election
Judges:
13 January, 2012·As per the submissions made by Mr.Jigar G. Gadhavi, learned advocate for the petitioner, the petitioner contested the election of Sarpanch and lost to respondent No.2. He has made a complaint regarding name of respondent No.2 in two Voters' List which, according to him, has been rejected by the Elec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indumati vs State
Judges:
13 January, 2012·1. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred, with the following prayers :"A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow the present petition;B. Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to act as per the Notices at Annexure-A colly with ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kutch vs Board
Judges:
13 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 27 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused in filing the Appeal has remained tota...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pareshkumar vs Atulkumar
Judges:
13 January, 2012·Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the partnership agreement between the parties contained an arbitration clause. In fact, Advocate Shri Virendra K. Bhatt was appointed as a sole arbitrator by joint consent of both sides. However, soon after the arbitration proceedings commenced, the respond...
High Court Of Gujarat
Atmarambhai vs State
Judges:
13 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicants.Notice returnable on 31.1.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Harijan
Judges:
13 January, 2012·Service of notice on opponent no. 3 Biharilal Trikambhai Thakkar is dispensed with in view of the fact that he is the owner of the vehicle insured by the appellant and the appellant's appeals are not founded on any ground which conflict with the interest of any of these opponents. Matter to be place...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.