Bharati vs Surat
Judges:
07 February, 2012·The matter may receive consideration, from another Bench.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dilipkumar vs Saraswatiben
Judges:
07 February, 2012·Mr.A.S.Vakil, learned advocate states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.1. Mr.Sandeep Singhi, learned advocate states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondents Nos.2 and 3. Both the learned advocates pray for time, in order to file thei...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Bs Patel For
Judges:
07 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned counsel Shri Amar Bhatt for the appellant stated that senior advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi appears with him.NOT BEFORE THIS COURT.To be placed before a Bench in which one of us (Coram: Akil Kureshi, J. ) is not a member.(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (C.L.SONI, J.) ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dr vs State
Judges:
07 February, 2012·Mr.Y.J.Patel, learned Counsel for respondent no.3 tenders Affidavit-in-Reply. To enable the petitioner to file Rejoinder, S.O. to 21.2.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganeshji vs Collector
Judges:
07 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) This is an application for condonation of delay of 530 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal.2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Though served, no affidavit-in-reply to the present application is filed by the respondents.3. Considering the contents of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Star vs Deputy
Judges:
07 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) Mr.Hashim Qureshi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. Permission as prayed for is granted. The Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. However, it is clarified that the imp...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chetankumar vs Chandreshkumar
Judges:
07 February, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.H.R. Prajapati urges that yet another Special Civil Application No.6513 of 2011 has been preferred by this petitioner and both the matters are required to be heard together since the subject matter is identical.Office to do the needful for placing both the matters together for se...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Bharatkumar
Judges:
07 February, 2012·By way of filing this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 the appellant - original opponent No.4 has challenged the judgment and order dated 27.2.1998 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main) at Ahmedabad (Rural) in MAC Petition No.1182 of 1988 whereby the Tri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahebub vs State
Judges:
07 February, 2012·1. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is taken up for hearing today.2. This is an application preferred by the applicant under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking bail against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the le...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramchandran vs Inquiry
Judges:
07 February, 2012·Learned Advocate has submitted that the controversy between the parties is being discussed in the mediation process and the parties are in the process of mediation. On such ground, request for adjournment for two weeks has been made. Hence, S.O. to 5th March 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.