Jalaram vs Union
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Leave to amend.Notice returnable on 22.02.2012. Direct service permitted.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dl vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Time to pay the process fee is extended till 13.2.2012.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanaiyalal vs Through
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Mr.Chauhan, learned advocate for the petitioner, tenders draft amendment, which is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.Mr.Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents, seeks time to enable him to take instructions. S.O. to 01.03.2012.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Heirs Of Kuntaben W
Judges:
09 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) This Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is arising out of the judgment and order dated 11.12.2002 passed by the Learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.7084 of 1999 whereby the Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ peti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladpuri Shivpuri Goswami & 4 ­ vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
09 February, 2012·PRAHLADPURI SHIVPURI GOSWAMI & 4 Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ====================================== Appearance :MR.HARDIK BHARHMBHAT for petitioners Mr. J.K. Shah, APP, for respondent : 1, MR.HARDIK B SHAH for Respondent(s) : 2, ====================================== C...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vaso vs Allied
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1 By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :"(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction by quashing and setting aside the impugned order dtd. 13.02.2009 passed by the Member, Board...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Manjulaben
Judges:
09 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Rule returnable on 9th March, 2012. There shall be stay of execution of the impugned award on condition that the applicant Insurance Company shall deposit entire awarded amounts including proportionate costs and interest immediately before the Claims Tribun...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prafull vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Learned counsel for the applicants submits that, barring offence punishable under Section 294B of the Indian Penal Code, other offences are non-cognizable and, further, version of the complainant does not inspire confidence since no detail about alleged scuffle is provided and no record exists about...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Karsanbhai
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 18.08.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Special], Porbandar in M.A.C.P. No. 15 of 2002, whereby the claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimants were entitled to recover an amount of Rs.3,24,500/-...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs This
Judges:
09 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH)1. This Appeal, under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against judgment and order dated 4.11.1988 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Sessions Case No. 42 of 1988 by which the accused was convicted for off...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.