Icici vs Rajesh
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands confirmed and shall continue as interim relief pending hearing and final disposal of the First Appeal. The entire amount deposited before the Tribunal concerned shall be invested in Fixed Deposit with any nationalized Bank in the name of 'Nazir' of the Tribun...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sukhiben vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·This petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred with the following prayers:"(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction and be pleased to quash and set aside the order of Respondent No.1 date...
High Court Of Gujarat
Suo vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Seen the affidavit of compliance filed by the State respondent.After going through the said affidavit and after hearing Mr. P.K. Jani, learned Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the State respondent, we find that it is a fit...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amrabhai vs Director
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1. Rule.Mr.Niraj Ashar, learned A.G.P. waives service of Rule on behalf the respondents.2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the application is taken up for final hearing forthwith.3. By way of this application, the applicant has prayed for fixing the main writ petition being ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narshibhai vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·[1] The present application is filed seeking to release the applicants on anticipatory bail as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-08 of 2012 registered with Lakhtar Police Station, District - Surendranagar.[2] Heard learned Senior advocate for the applicant.[3] This Court...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Ks Nanavati For
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Learned Advocate Mr. K.S.Acharya for the petitioner states before the Court that the respondent-Mill Company has approached the Board of Industrial Finance Reconstruction, as it is a sick unit and is closed down at present. In view of these state of affairs, learned Advocate states that the petition...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sharika vs State
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Mr.Hitesh N. Acharya, learned advocate for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, with a view to making a representation to the concerned Authority.Permission to withdraw the petition, is granted.The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Federation vs District
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1. The petitioner No.1 is Federation of Forest Workmen Co-op. Societies which had preferred Special Civil Suit No. 205 of 2001 seeking declaration that the members workmen working under different Co-operative Societies in the Forest of District Valsad, be treated to be continuing into the service fu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandresh vs Shilaben
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Junagadh has arrived to the conclusion that the petitioner is earning Rs.10,000/- pm without any material or evidence on record. He further submits that the order of awarding maintenance of Rs.3,000/- and Rs....
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Balubhai
Judges:
09 February, 2012·1. The appellant herein has challenged the award dated 07.03.2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Bhavnagar below Ex. 12 in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 1162 of 2000 so far as the Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,54,000/- by way of compensation to the original claimants along with 9% intere...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.