Sai vs Gujarat
Judges:
10 February, 2012·1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant-original petitioner to condone the delay of 327 days in preferring the review application in Arbitration Petition No. 92/2009.2. Having heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and considering the necessa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Devkumar vs Gujarat
Judges:
10 February, 2012·This Court (Coram: Anant S. Dave, J.) vide order dated 25.11.2011 was pleased to issue notice and make it returnable on 22.12.2011. Thereafter, the matter was listed before this Court on 12.01.2012 and thereafter, the matter is listed today.The concerned respondents have not filed affidavit-in-reply...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gopalbhai vs State
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Mr.Shah, learned APP, on instructions received from respondent Nos.2 and 3, states that the vehicle in question detained due to the excess load than the permissible limit under the Motor Vehicle Act will be released upon the petitioner producing necessary documents viz. Registration Certificate of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvind vs Liladhar
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Office objections to be removed on or before 2nd March, 2012, failing which, the matter shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution.( Harsha Devani, J. ) hki Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rupen Patel ­ vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
10 February, 2012·RUPEN PATEL Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ====================================== Appearance :Mr. Dhaval Dave, Senior Advocate with MRPAJADEJA for Applicant Mr. J.K. Shah, APP, for respondent : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 2, ====================================== CORAM : ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhartiya vs Yogeshbhai
Judges:
10 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Heard learned senior advocate Mr.Percy Kavina appearing with learned advocate Ms.Mamta R. Vyas for the appellants. The learned senior advocate states that he is trying to persuade his client to buy peace in the matter by finding out an amicable solution ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vinay vs Commissioner
Judges:
10 February, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 10.10.2011 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gsrtc vs Ijatshing
Judges:
10 February, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 15.07.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Ahmedabad in M.A.C.P. No.95/1995 whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed and the respondents, original claimants, were awarded total compensation of Rs.2.98 L...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Hm Parikh For
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Heard the Ld. Advocates at length and after having gone through the judgment passed by the Trial Judge, I see no reasons to interference with the findings recorded by the Trial Judge. In my view, the Ld.Trial Judge has correctly appreciatal the evidence on record. Since, I am in total agreement with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Manish R Bhatt For
Judges:
09 February, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.Soparkar for the petitioner states before the Court that the petitioner has already filed appeal against the impugned order before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the same is pending final disposal. In view of this fact and without prejudice to any of the contentions raised...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.