Vinodbhai vs Commissioner
Judges:
10 February, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 22.10.2011 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harshaben vs Bank
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Learned Advocate Mr. PC Master states that his name is wrongly shown on the Board. Petitioners had already taken away papers from him long before and now, learned Advocate Mr. Arun H. Mehta as also learned advocate Mr. Haresh B. Shah are appearing for the petitioner. When the matter is called out, n...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shri vs The
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Stand over to 22nd February 2012. Registry is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings of Criminal Inquiry Case No. 82 of 2000 (New Case No.1531 of 2006) and Criminal Inquiry Case No.95 of 2000 (New Case No.1557 of 2006) from the Court of learned JMFC, Anand so as to reach this Court on or be...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khodaji vs Unknown
Judges:
10 February, 2012·The matters are adjourned to 2nd March 2012.[ Ravi R. Tripathi, J. ] hiren Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Ms Ps Parmar For
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any ground for grant of interim relief as prayed for in this Civil Application. Grant of interim relief of the nature as prayed for in the Civil Application will amount to grant of final relief, which this Court normally should not gran...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhagwanbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
10 February, 2012·1. The petitioner has sought restoration of the original petition which was dismissed for default on 16.01.2012. That order reads as under:"None present for the petitioner. Even as the petition was dismissed for default on an earlier occasion and restored, only an adjournment was sought on behalf of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amit vs State
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Rule.Learned APP, Ms.C.M.Shah, waives service of rule on behalf of the State.Heard learned advocate, Mr.P.P.Majmudar for the applicants, learned APP, Ms.C.M.Shah for the State and learned advocate, Mr.A.R.Mehta for the original complainant.The present application is filed seeking to release the appl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manojkumar vs State
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Leave to join Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. as party respondent.Issue Notice returnable on 17.2.2012.Direct service qua newly joined party.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Uttar vs Pinki
Judges:
10 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Pursuant to order dated 09.01.2012, counsel for the appellants stated that appellants have deposited a sum of Rs. 14,66,532/- before the Trial Court on 24.01.2012.Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct that 25% of the amount deposited by th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gammon vs Sabarmati
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant relies only on two clauses in the entire document which run into over 100 pages. Xerox copies of such document is already produced on record. Upon the applicant producing typed copies of the relevant clauses of the document, requirement for producin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.