Taral vs Bharatji
Judges:
10 February, 2012·BELOW OFFICE NOTE.Considering the letter written by 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gandhinagar before whom Special Civil Suit No. 375 of 2011 is pending at the stage of hearing of application for Temporary Injunction Exh.5, the time to decide the Temporary ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Navdurga vs Official
Judges:
10 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in view of the order dated 12.01.2012 passed by learned Company Judge [Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M.Thacker] in Company Application No.508 of 2011 in Company Petition No.173 of 1986 with Official Liquidator Report N...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harkaish vs Union
Judges:
10 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the averments made in the application, we find that for effective adjudication of the dispute involved in the main writ-application, the amendment proposed sh...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Somiben
Judges:
10 February, 2012·At the instance of Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati learned counsel for the appellant respondent no.4 is ordered to be deleted since the legal heirs are already on record. Mr. Nanavti mainly submitted that the deceased was travelling in a 'goods vehicle' and therefore, the appellant-Insurance Company is not lia...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Niranjanaben
Judges:
10 February, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 15.03.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Panchmahals at Godhra in M.A.C.P. No.1131/1992 whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed and respondents no.1 & 2, original claimants, were awarded total compen...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amrutbhai vs Registrar
Judges:
10 February, 2012·RULE.To be heard along with Special Civil Application No.14286 of 2011. Mrs. V.D. Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of Rule for respondent No.1 and Mr. R.P. Modi, learned advocate waives service of Rule for respondent No.2.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajubaben vs Saurashtra
Judges:
10 February, 2012·1. RULE.Mr. A.R. Thacker, learned advocate waives service of Rule for the respondent University. With consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner in capacity of the Managing Trust...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surendramani vs State
Judges:
10 February, 2012·This petition is arising out of FIR being I.CR.No. 180 of 2007 registered with Pandesara Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 465, 467, 468, 471, 386, 330, 365, 114, 188 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code. These very petitioners have, as stated in para-4 of this memo of pe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Hs Munshaw For
Judges:
10 February, 2012·This Civil Application is filed by the original claimants to direct the office to transfer the amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited in this Court by the appellant on September 15, 1994, to the M.A.C.Tribunal, Junagadh, in M.A.C. Petition No.12 of 1987 and Execution Application No. 28 of 1994.At the time ...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Kamlaben
Judges:
10 February, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 23.01.2005 on the Bhalej - Anand Road, in which Ravjibhai Shankerbhai Parmar expired, his legal heirs filed M.A.C.P. No.32/2005 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Nadiad, which came to be partly allowed, by way of impugne...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.