Textile Labour Union
Judges: R M Chhaya
10 April, 2012·1. By way of both these Writ Petitions, the petitioner Mill Company has challenged the order passed by the Industrial Court dated 23.12.1998 in Reference (IC) No. 121 of 1990 as well as the order passed in Review Application (IC) No. 4 of 1999 dated 10.12.1999 as also the order passed in Refer...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manubhai Maganbhai Patel vs Jayeshbhai Kiritbhai Patel &
Judges:
10 April, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD O.J.APPEAL No. 17 of 2009 In COMPANY APPLICATION No. 429 of 2008 In COMPANY APPLICATION No. 329 of 2008 In COMPANY APPLICATION No. 216 of 2008 In COMPANY APPLICATION No. 449 of 2004 In OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR REPORT No. 81 of 2003 In COMPANY PETITION No. 66 of 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jinabhai vs State
Judges:
10 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned counsel for the appellant shall file affidavit-in-rejoinder in the office. List this matter on 23.4.2012.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (A.J.DESAI, J.) syed/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs Official
Judges:
10 April, 2012·Registry is directed to show name of Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt, learned advocate for the Income-Tax Department. S.O. to 12.4.2012.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mitaben vs Pramodbhai
Judges:
10 April, 2012·The present Civil Revision Application is of the year 2000 and still the respondent is unserved. Under the circumstances and considering the fact that even if the Civil Revision Application is allowed, the question is with respect to approximately four months pendente lite maintenance, the present C...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vardhan vs Present
Judges:
10 April, 2012·1. Present Civil Revision Application under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "Bombay Rent Act" for short) has been preferred by the petitioner herein -original defendant/tenant to quash and set aside the impugned Judgement ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Smt.Bhartiben vs Administrator
Judges:
10 April, 2012·1. There was limited consensus between learned counsel appearing on both sides that hearing of the petition was inordinately delayed and prolonged on account of consistent failure on the part of the respondent Nagarpalika in complying with even formal orders of this court, particularly since the yea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhanwarsingh vs Industrial
Judges:
10 April, 2012·In spite of the court's order, no payment is made. Hence, Chief General Manager of respondent No.2 is ordered to remain personally present tomorrow i.e. on 11.04.2012 at 11.00 a.m. Copy of this order shall be provided to Mr. Hasurkar, learned advocate for the respondent No.2.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] JYOTI ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Revaben vs Shantaben
Judges:
10 April, 2012·Notice to the respondents returnable on 18th April 2012.Direct service is permitted today.{Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.} Prakash* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.