Kartikbhai vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·As can be noted from the record, the respondent No.2 could not be served for not having been found at the given address. According to learned advocate Mr. Panchal address has been taken from the cause title of the bail application preferred before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aayar vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Learned APP, Mr.Pandya, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.By way of this application, the applicant-convict has prayed that he be enlarged on temporary bail to complete the construction of his house.From jail remarks, we find that...
High Court Of Gujarat
Helfer vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Respondent no. 3 - Amit Simonbhai Christian and the corpus Veronica are before us, and are represented through learned advocate Mr. Chetan Raval. The petitioner is represented by learned advocate Ms. P.C. Fernandez.The petitioner is father of the corpus. Accord...
High Court Of Gujarat
Digjam vs Unknown
Judges:
13 April, 2012·1. ADMIT.The petition is fixed for final hearing on 04.05.2012.2. The notice of hearing of this petition be advertised in 'Indian Express', Ahmedabad Edition and Sandesh, Ahmedabad Edition and Rajkot Edition. Publication of notice shall appear in the aforesaid newspapers, at least 10 days before the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rahil vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·This Court granted bail to the present applicants vide order dated 07.03.2012 pased in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1974 of 2012 on condition to execute personal bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one solvent surety of the like amount.Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the surety h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharti vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Board shows that the Rule is not received back for respondent No.2.This application is preferred by the applicant to condone the delay of 138 days in filing main Revision Application.Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the Family Court issued warrant against the respondent, but he did ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naynaben vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Heard Mr. Savani, learned advocate for the applicant.2. Present application has been taken out seeking below mentioned relief/direction:-"6(B) Be pleased to permit the applicant to present copy of the restoration application being Misc. Civil Application (Stamp) No.1272 of 2005 with annexure and als...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kishoriba vs Shaileshbhai
Judges:
13 April, 2012·The remarks in the cause list suggests that respondent no. 6/1 could not be served as she is reported to have expired. The appellants / applicants to take appropriate steps in this matter in accordance with law to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of the expired respondent. S O to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Varshaben vs Vigilance
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Notice returnable on 15.6.2012.(K.M. THAKER, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ezaz vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Notice returnable on 13.6.2012.Meanwhile no coercive action against the applicant be taken, keeping it open for the investigating officer to record the statement of witnesses or verify any other material.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.