Yusufmiya vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Learned APP, Mr.Pandya, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.By way of this application, the applicant-convict has prayed that he be enlarged on temporary bail since he wants to take private treatment for his cataract problem.From ap...
High Court Of Gujarat
3.Mr Rasesh H Parikh For ... vs Notice Served By
Judges:
13 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) As prayed for by the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India, time to file affidavit-in-reply is granted till April 16, 2012.Let the matter appear as specially fixed at 2.30 PM on April 16, 2012.[BHASKAR BH...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shailendrasinh vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Considering the request made by the learned Principal District Judge, Rajkot, for extension of six month's time to dispose of Sessions Case no.124 of 2009 pending in his Court and office note dated 12.4.2012 submitted by the Registry, the time as prayed for is granted. The trial court is directed to...
High Court Of Gujarat
M/S vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioners.Notice returnable on 20.6.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Balubhai
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of para 6 (A), (B), (C ), (D) & (E).Office to issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents in the main matter as per the order in Civil Application making it returnable on 18.06.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Div...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maitri vs Municipal
Judges:
13 April, 2012·The petitions challenge the communication dated 19.09.2007 (wrongly mentioned as "21.09.2007" in the prayer-clause), by the Commissioner, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, whereby, the Commissioner, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation has recommended to the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Urba...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajabhai vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·No case is made out to waive the cost of Rs.25,000/- imposed in Criminal Misc. Application No.2100 of 2012 by order dated 2.3.2012, while rejecting the eighth successive bail application filed by the applicant. The said order dated 2.3.2012 reads as under:"This eighth successive application is filed...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manisha vs New
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Leave to amend.1.1 Heard Mr. Gandhi, learned advocate for the applicant, and Mr. Nanavati, learned advocate for the opponent Nos.1, 2 and 4.2. The applicant - writ petitioner has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief/direction:-"YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to fix the date of...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Rukhiben
Judges:
13 April, 2012·It has been the consistent practice of this High Court not to enter into the merits of those appeals wherein the claim in appeal is small, and claims upto Rs.1,00,000/- have been quantified by this Court as petty claims. Since the amount involved in this appeal is less than Rs.1,00,000/-, this appea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshbhai vs State
Judges:
13 April, 2012·Heard Mr.R.S. Sanjanwala, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Dilip L. Kanojiya, learned advocate for the petitioners. It is submitted by him that the impugned notice under Section 76A of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 has been issued dehors the proviso that prescribes a limitation ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.