(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Since this Court in the case of Mansa Synthetic Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, reported in AIR 2012 GUJ 90, has already upheld the validity of the provisions contained in Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, we do not find any reason to entertain the prayer 12(A) of this application.
As regards the prayer 12(B) of this application, we propose not to enter into this question. Let this application be placed before the appropriate learned Single Judge for considering the prayer 12(B) of this application.
We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the prayer (B) and restricted our scrutiny only to the prayer 12(A).
(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Acting C.J.) (J.B.
Pardiwala, J.) Aakar Top