Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Govind @ Golu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51572 of 2019 Applicant :- Govind @ Golu Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sacchida Nand Prajapati,Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant and vakalatnama filed by Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav on behalf of the complainant are taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant, learned AGA and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is devar of the deceased. There was no dispute of demand of dowry. The applicant has not harassed or tortured the deceased. It has further been submitted that there is general allegation against the applicant, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. In the postmortem report, the cause of death of the deceased has been shown asphyxia due to ante mortem hanging. The deceased has committed suicide herself. The applicant has not compelled the deceased to commit suicide. There is no direct evidence against the applicant. The applicant has no concern with the alleged incident and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The co-accused Rajneesh Kumar, the jeth of the deceased, has already been released on bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 30.9.2019 in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 40786 of 2019, therefore, applicant is also entitled for bail. The applicant is in jail since 16.2.2019.
Per contra, learned AGA and learned counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer for bail and argued that the applicant and other co accused have committed the alleged offence, therefore, the applicant is not entitled for bail.
Having given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Govind @ Golu involved in Case Crime No.80 of 2019 under Section 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 D.P.Act, Police Station Ajeetmal District Auraiya be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidences.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and he will cooperate with the trial.
3. The applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned.
In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 Gss
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Govind @ Golu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2019
Judges
  • Bachchoo Lal
Advocates
  • Sacchida Nand Prajapati Anand Pati Tiwari