IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.56417/2014 (GM-CC) BETWEEN:
SMT.G.D.SUKANYA, W/O SRI.GANGADHAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O NO.2, TELECOM LAYOUT, BOGADI II STAGE NORTH, MYSORE – 570 026. … PETITIONER (BY SRI.A.KESHAVA BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRE CELL, MANGALORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUILDING, URVA STORES, MANGALORE – 575 006.
2. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER, BSNL, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE – 570 012.
3. B.S.N.L JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, MYSORE – 570 012. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C. JAGADISH, SPL. COUNSEL FOR R1; SRI.VISHNU BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 - ABSENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO CASE NO. JAV1/19/ NAHAJANI/MANGALORE DIVISION/2014 DATED 10.11.2014 FROM THE FILE OF THE R-1 AND ON PERUSAL OF THE SAME AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.A. Keshava Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.C. Jagadish, Special Counsel for Respondent No.1.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally. Records perused.
3. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the impugned notice dated 10.11.2014.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the controversy involved in the petition is squarely covered by an order dated 13.02.2019 in W.P.No.6479/17.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions and for the reasons assigned in the order dated 13.02.2019 passed in W.P.No.6479/2017, the impugned notice dated 10.11.2014 is quashed. However, the respondents are granted the liberty to take action against the petitioner if so advised in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off.
Sd/- JUDGE cbc