Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Furqaan vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31450 of 2018 Applicant :- Furqaan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sufia Saba,Sayeed Saif Ullah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
According to the prosecution case the F.I.R. was lodged against eight accused person namely Mukarram, Akaram, Furkan, Buddhu, Kala, Billa, Ninna @ Tilli and Pandit @ Badi alleging that on 3.4.2018, accused Mukarram was arrested by the police with 15 Kg. beef and some instruments for slaughtering and other accused persons were fled away.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that recovery is false and planted. Co-accused namely Akram, Billa @ Bilal @ Parvej, Budhu @ Nafis and Mukarram have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 4.7.2018, 12.7.2018 and 24.7.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 24692 of 2018, 24716 of 2018, 23506 of 2018 and 27598 of 2018, since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. There is no independent witness against the applicant. Police has falsely planted to show his good work. The applicant is innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 23.7.2018 (near about one month) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Furqaan involved in Case Crime No. 94 of 2018, under Section 3/5-A/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Behat, District Saharanpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Furqaan vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 August, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Sufia Saba Sayeed Saif Ullah