IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOs.10972/2018 & 11031-11033/2018(KLR-RES) BETWEEN FORTUNE BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.78/1, K R ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR MAHESH DESHPANDE ... PETITIONER (BY SRI S.G.PRASHANTH MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU -560 001 3. TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI – 562 110 4. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT HAROLLI REVENUE CIRCLE VIJAYAPURA HOBLI-562 135 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR VIJAYAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 135 6. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR VIJAYAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 135 7. SRI T. RIPUNJAYA REDDY S/O SRI T V RAGHAVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A NO.717, 2ND FLOOR, POORNASHASHI COMPLEX (ABOVE MARUTHI SHOWROOM) MODI HOSPITAL ROAD, 2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD BASAVESWARANAGAR BENGALURU-560086 8. SRI CHINMOY M S/O MADHAVAREDDY G AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A NO.45 LAKSHMANA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, MARUTHI NAGAR, NAGARBHAVI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560072 9. SRI SAYEESH M S/O MADHAVAREDDY G AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A NO.45 LAKSHMANA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, MARUTHI NAGAR NAGARBHAVI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-500 072 10. MUNEERA BEGUM W/O SHEK SHA VALI K AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A NO.44 S-4 STREET, MACKAN ROAD BENGALURU-560001 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE [ANNEXURE-D] AND THE AUCTION NOTICE BEARING No.M.S.C./C.R:04/2017-18 DATED NIL [ANNEXURE-D1] ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NOs.4 TO 6 INSOFAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that these Writ Petitions have become infructuous and he may be permitted to withdraw the same.
The said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.
Accordingly, these Writ Petitions, which have become infructuous, are dismissed as withdrawn Sd/- JUDGE sma