Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

^For Respondent vs Order

Madras High Court|02 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the plaintiff reported no instructions on 9.2.2017. Therefore, notice was sent to the plaintiff by this court through registry. The same is also served on the wife of the plaintiff on 28.2.2017. Despite service of notice, the plaintiff has not come before this court. Today also there is no representation for him. The plaintiff is called absent. The above fact clearly indicates that he is not interested in prosecuting the suit and other applications. Hence, the suit and other applications are dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there is no order as to costs.
2.3.2017.
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ssk.
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J ssk.
C.S.No.466 of 2012 2.3.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

^For Respondent vs Order

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 March, 2017