HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY & SRI.K.B.NAIK, MEMBER REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.191/2018 (LOK ADALATH NO.2521/2019) BETWEEN:
FAKEERAPPA S/O MELAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS, 1. SMT.PANKAJA W/O SHANKARAPPA, D/O LATE FAKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING NEAR KARUVINAKATTE CIRCLE, CHITRADURGA TOWN - 577 501.
2. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE FAKIRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3. SMT.BEBI W/O MANJUNATH D/O LATE FAKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 4. MISS. MAHADEVI D/O LATE FAKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 5. P RAVI S/O LATE FAKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 6. MAHANTHESH S/O LATE FAKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, APPELLANTS NO.2 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT 3RD CROSS, JOGIMATTI ROAD, CHITRADURGA CITY – 577 501. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.A V GANGADHARAPPA, ADV.) AND:
1. SMT.THIPPAMMA W/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 2. SMT. L PADMAVATI D/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 3. RAMESH S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 4. HARISH S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 5. SHARANAPPA S/O MELAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RAJAPPA S/O MELAPPA SINCE DEAD BY L.RS 6. SMT.VARALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 7. SATISH S/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 8. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 9. SMT.BHAGYAMMA W/O VENUGOPALA & D/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 10. CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE MELAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 11. BASAVARAJAPPA S/O LATE MELAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE, JOGIMATTI ROAD, CHITRADURGA CITY – 577 501.
12. SMT.HOSURAMMA DEAD BY LRS 12.(a).GORAVAPPA S/O.LATE NINGAPPA BEHIND VIJAYA KUMAR SHOP MUNICIPAL COLONY KELAGOTE, CHITRADURGA CITY. 12.(b).DYAMAPPA S/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(c).ESHAPPA S/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(d).MYLARAPPA S/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(e).SMT PAPAMMA W/O.SHARANAPPA D/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(f).RENUKAMMA W/O.ANJINAPPA D/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(g).MUNIYAMMA D/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(h).DEVIRAMMA D/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(i).LAKSHMAPPA C/O.LATE NINGAPPA 12.(j).KUMARA S/O.LAKSHMAPPA 12.(k).ANJANEYA @ ANJANI S/O.LAKSHMAPPA 12.(l).MADHU S/O.LAKSHMAPPA RESPONDENT No.12(b) TO 12(l) ARE R/O.TURUVANURU ROAD BESTHARA D.NINGAPPA LAYOUT OPP TO VIBHAVA LAYOUT CHITRADURGA CITY-577 501 13. SMT.RADHAMMA W/O NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDENT OF JATPAT NAGARA, JOGIMATTI ROAD, CHITRADURGA CITY – 577 501.
14. SMT.ANNAPOORNAMMA W/O GUDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHAKARA VILLAGE, RANEBENNUR TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT – 581 115.
15. SHANKARAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 16. DORESWAMY S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 17. SMT.VASANTHAMMA D/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 18. VENUGOPAL S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 19. SMT.KAMALAMMA W/O LATE RAMESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS 20. CHANDRU S/O RAMESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 21. SURESHA S/O RAMESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 22. SMT.LATHA D/O.RAMESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 23. SMT.SHARADAMMA W/O PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 24. RUDRESH S/O PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 25. SMT.SOWMYA D/O PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 26. NAVEENA S/O PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.15 TO 26 ARE RESIDENTS OF KARUVINAKATTE CIRCLE, BEHIND THIPPINGATTAMMA TEMPLE, CHITRADURGA CITY – 577 501. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B M SIDDAPPA, ADV. FOR C/R5-R11) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.10.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.57/2016 & 58/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA DISMISSING THE APPEALS AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.09.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.18/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHITRADURGA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for respondents along with parties are present. A compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC is filed duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel. The signatures of the parties are admitted by the parties and their signatures are identified by their respective counsel. The parties have admitted contents of the compromise petition. We have gone through the compromise petition. There is no impediment to accept the compromise entered into between the parties.
Accordingly, Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. Impugned judgments are accordingly modified. Draw the decree accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE akd Sd/-
MEMBER