Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Eashwar Natarajan vs Geetha Srinivasan And Others

Madras High Court|05 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the matter has become infructuous and the Appeal Suit in A.S.No.195 of 2006 is dismissed on merits and to that effect he also made an endorsement in the petition.
M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
vs 2.Recording the said submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.01.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To
1. The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Chennai.
2. The XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras.
C.R.P.No.2387 of 2007 and
M.P.No.1 of 2007
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Eashwar Natarajan vs Geetha Srinivasan And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran