IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 35659/2015(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. E.B.SUSHEELA W/O E.G.BALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS #3, 9TH CROSS, N.R. COLONY BANGALORE-560 019.
(BY SRI. VENKATARAMANA K.S. ADV.) AND:
…PETITIONER 1. THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.3, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD BANGALORE-560 018 BY ITS PRESIDENT.
2. THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.3, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560 018 BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.R.UMADEVI, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE DATED: 09.07.2015 ISSUED BY THE r2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The learned counsel for the respondents-Bank has filed a memo stating that the petitioner has paid the entire loan amount and the loan account is closed. Hence, the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo filed, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE DM