Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

D.S.Syed Hussain vs The Secretary

Madras High Court|09 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition is filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from allotting afresh any Local Cable TV Operator in the existing area and allow the petitioners herein to provide Digital Addressable System Signal to their intending customers.
2. The petitioners, being private Cable TV Operators, are before this Court, contending that the second respondent corporation, which was introduced in the year 2011, is forcing all the LCOs and MSOs to register with them, failing which, they are threatening to seal the premises. In the meanwhile, the Central Government has introduced a scheme called Digital Addressable System (DAS), fixing an outer time limit and the second respondent has not obtained the said DAS licence so far. While that being so, in order to provide digital signals to their intending customers, the petitioners had tied up with private MSOs and started providing DAS signals to their customers. Whereas, all of a sudden, the second respondent corporation started allotting new LCOs to the areas which were already covered by existing LCOs, viz., the petitioners herein. This action of the second respondent corporation is nothing but violation of its own undertaking before this Court, in several writ petitions and aggrieved by the same, the present petition came to be filed for the aforesaid relief.
3. Though the learned Counsel for the petitioners has raised several grounds in this petition, the main point urged by the petitioners is that the second respondent has proposed to appoint new LCOs in the area which was allotted to the petitioners, thereby intending to transfer the customers of the petitioners to the newly appointed LCOs, without getting consent from them and without issuing any notice to them. This act of the second respondent corporation is highly unjustifiable, since this unilateral transfer of customers to new LCOs will not only affect the existing service providers, but also detrimental to the interest of the customers.
4. Heard the learned Counsel on either side and perused the documents placed on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into account the pendency of the application submitted by the second respondent for DAS licence, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent corporation to issue notice to the petitioners before appointing new LCOs as well as obtain the willingness of the customers for such transfer, through the petitioners and thereafter, pass necessary orders on the matter, in one way or the other, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1.The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 'A' Wing Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi ? 110 001.
2.M/s. Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Represented by General Manager, ?Dugar Towers?, 6th Floor, Old No.34, New No.123, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai ? 600 008.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

D.S.Syed Hussain vs The Secretary

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 November, 2017