1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State.
2. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following principal reliefs:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the respondents/opposite parties for joining of the petitioners to the class-IV post and consider the grievances of the petitioners.
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the respondents/opposite parties for joining of the petitioners on the class-IV post and consider the grievances of the petitioners and decide the pending representations of the petitioners in pursuance of the Hon'ble High Court judgment and order dated 24.01.2019 passed in writ petition no.331 (S/S) of 1996, Bhanu Pratap Verma Vs. State of U.P. & others along with bunch of petition."
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was selected under the advertisement dated 16.11.1995 and he is also entitled for the benefit of the judgment and order dated 24.01.2019 passed in Writ Petition No. 331 (S/S) of 1996; Bhanu Pratap Verma Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel states that in case of Bhanu Pratap Verma (supra), all the persons before the Court were such persons who joined in the year 1995 and the petitioner in the present case did not join.
5. Learned Standing Counsel though admits that those persons who filed aforesaid writ petition and joined in the year 1995 were retrained to work and were permitted to work only after the final disposal of their writ petition.
6. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that it is open for the appropriate authority to look into the said controversy and take a final decision on the same. At this stage, he only desires that representations of petitioner may be considered and decided in time bound manner.
7. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make fresh detailed representations to respondent no.2 Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Badshah Nagar, Lucknow, U.P. raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents, relevant government orders or judgment of this Court, if any, in support of their claim within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.
8. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.
9. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.
10. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.11.2019 Subodh/-