Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23499 of 2019 Petitioner :- Dhaniram Respondent :- Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length.
The writ petition arises out of proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act for mutation.
All the three Courts below have decided against the petitioner and therefore, all the three orders are under challenge.
The proceedings for mutation are summary proceedings having purely fiscal connotations. In view of Section 40A of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, the findings returned in these proceedings are not binding upon the Courts in regular title proceedings.
Under the circumstances, this Court does not consider it expedient to interfere in the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed with the observation that the petitioner, in case so advised, may seek a declaration in his favour.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 RKM