Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17683 of 2019 Applicant :- Danish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Avijit Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He was not named in the FIR. Mobile number disclosed in the FIR are also not related to the present applicant. Nothing was stated by the victim against the applicant in the statement under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. For the first time after recording statement under Section164 Cr.P.C. an affidavit was filed on behalf of the victim disclosing the name of the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 23.1.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Danish involved in Case Crime No. 689 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 376-D I.P.C. and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Quarsi, District Aligarh be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions :
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 Sachdeva