Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Chinnakandan @ Kandasamy And Others vs Palanisamy And Others

Madras High Court|03 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that challenging the order granting, the petitioner has withdraw the earlier suit to file a fresh suit. Pending the civil revision petition, the respondent has filed a fresh suit and the same was dismissed. It is also reported by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, again the second suit S.L.P. pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
03.01.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To The Sub-Court, Sankari.
M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
vs
C.R.P.No.1594 of 2006
03.01.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chinnakandan @ Kandasamy And Others vs Palanisamy And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
03 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.