By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner is directly recruited as Sub Inspector of Police in the year 1997-98 and belongs to Backward Class community. He was attached to Chennai Range and his registration number is 12735 and secured 76.8750 marks in the recruitment. The petitioner went for training in the 2nd batch on 22.05.2000. The petitioner would further submit that the following candidates who belongs to B.C. community and who have secured lower marks than him have been sent for the training in the 1st batch on 16.05.1999.
Candidate Reg.No.
Name Community Date of Birth Marks Secured in USSRB 11994 S.Ravikumar BC 75.000 11270 K.Kingsly Devanand BC 19.06.1972 74.8750 11130 P.Vikneswaran BC 15.06.1970 73.9375 12442 K.Ambedkar BC 22.10.1975 73.7500 10274 S.Jayakrishnan BC 29.05.1973 72.4375 12368 T.Selvam BC 30.12.1971 72.1250 10442 S.Kumaresan BC 25.04.1973 71.9375 According to him, the persons who were less meritorious were deputed in the 1st batch training erroneously and the seniority was also fixed taking into account 75% of the Police Train College marks and 25% of the Tamil Nadu Uniform Service Recruitment Board marks. Some of the persons made a challenge before this Court by filing writ petitions and the writ petitions were disposed of directing to consider their representations and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time. However, the first respondent, instead of considering the claim of all the persons, have taken into consideration the claim of persons who had approached this Court and passed G.O.No.93 dated 06.02.2015 stating that it is applicable to the persons who had approached the Court and got orders. The petitioner, in this regard, has also submitted a representation dated 15.03.2016 to the respondents praying for refixation of seniority on par with the 1st batch persons, based on the representation as well as G.O.No.684, Home (Police-3) Department dated 03.10.2015 and since no orders have been passed, he came forward to file this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter in issue is covered by the earlier order of this Court dated 26.03.2015 made in W.P.No.3955 of 2015 etc. batch and the said order was also followed while passing order in W.P.No.34099 of 2015 dated 27.10.2015 and therefore, prays for appropriate orders.
4. Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government pleader appearing for the M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.
vsi respondents.
5. Though the petitioner prays for a larger relief, this Court in the light of the above facts and circumstances, without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, directs the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2016 on merits and in accordance with law and in the light of the above cited Government Orders and pass appropriate orders within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
09.02.2017 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No vsi To
1. The Secretary to Government, Home (Police-3) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.