Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chandrashekar @ Chandan vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|06 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 501/2019 BETWEEN CHANDRASHEKAR @ CHANDAN S/O. SADASHIVA, AGED 19 YEARS R/AT. NO.10, NEAR ELUMANDAMMA TEMPLE BEHIND SANJEEVINI HOSPITAL DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI BENGALURU – 560 076 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.S. VENKATACHALAPATHI, ADV. (ABSENT)) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHO, MICO LAYOUT PS BENGALURU CITY REP. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HONNAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.344/2018 OF MICO LAYOUT POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 341, 323, 307 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 25(1-B), 27 OF ARMS ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The matter having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the petitioner nor his counsel present. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
The order sheet also disclose that, though granting sufficient opportunity, the office objection has not been complied with. It appears, counsel for the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandrashekar @ Chandan vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
06 November, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra