When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the third respondent has stated that the benefits sought for in the above writ petition were already settled and issued orders vide letter No.p19/02/Rev/2011-12/21901579 dated 11.10.2011 and the same has been mentioned in para-5 in the counter affidavit filled by the third respondent. Therefore, he prays that nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition and the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the third respondent, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
07.09.2017 Index : Yes/No kal To
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006.
3. The Accounts Officer, Office of the Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlements) Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 018.
4. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Educational Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
5. The Assistant Elementary Educational officer, Sathankulam Tuticorin District.
M.V.MURALIDARAN,J.
kal Writ Petition No.27229 of 2010 07.09.2017