Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20298 of 2018 Applicant :- Bramh Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Kaustubh Srivastava,Kandarp Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased, who has been falsely implicated in the present case on general allegations. Learned counsel further contends that the applicant was living separately from the victim and her husband in a separate portion of the same house and has no concerned with the affairs of the victim or her husband. It is thus contended that the implication of the applicant is false and is against the settled principles of law as laid down in the matter of Geeta's Mehrotra case. Learned counsel has next contended that there is nothing on record to connect the applicant in commission of the alleged offence and that there is no conclusion of the trial in near future. Learned counsel has next contended that the applicant is neither a previous convict nor he has any previous criminal history and that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 14.01.2018.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
Perused the first information report as well as averments contained in the bail application.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, let the applicant Bramh Singh involved in Case Crime No.781 of 2017, under Section 498A, 304-B I.P.C., and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kharkhauda, District Meerut, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
2. The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
3. The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial Court.
4. The applicant shall not leave the district without permission from the concerned Court below.
In case of breach of any of the conditions enumerated above, the order granting bail shall automatically stand cancelled.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018/S.Ali