Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Brajesh Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6085 of 2019 Petitioner :- Brajesh Sharma Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajitam Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Ajitam Srivastava, learned Counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to respondent 2 i.e. District Magistrate, Agra to decide representation dated 08.01.2019 (annexure 4 to writ petition) pending before him, as expeditiously as possible.
3. We find that in respect of grievance, petitioner has statutory alternative remedy under the provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. Writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Brajesh Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ajitam Srivastav